Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ براہ راست قابل اعتماد وکیل تک رسائی
ابھی وکیل سے بات کرنی ہے؟

صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔

☎ فون اور واٹس ایپ تک رسائی ⚖ تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری 🔒 محفوظ ادائیگی
⚡ صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء سے رابطہ کریں
ایک بار ادائیگی کریں۔ اپنی قانونی ضرورت کے مطابق وکلاء کے رابطہ نمبرز کھولیں۔

BARKAT SHAH versus MST. SULTAN ZARI


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) The cancellation of bail emphasized on the bail of the accused woman living with persons of good character and thus her freedom was abused. Nevertheless, no evidence was able to prove its bad character. Her fellow respondents, being a woman, denied bail conditions, under the law entitled to bail

1986 P Cr. L J 980

[Peshawar]

Before Faiz Muhammad Khan, J

BARKAT SHAH Petitioner

Versus

Mst. SULTAN ZARI and others Respondents

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 246 of 1982, decided on 2nd June, 1982.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

----S. 497(5)‑‑Bail cancellation of‑‑Cancellation of bail of accused‑lady urged on ground that she was living with persons not of good character and as such misused her liberty, yet no evidence led to prove bad character of her associates‑‑Respondent, being a woman, held, under law entitled to grant of bail‑‑Cancellation of bail declined‑ circum stances.

Muhammad Ashraf Khan Gadoon for Petitioner.

ORDER

He contends the respondent No. 1 is now living with the persons who are not of good character. He, therefore, submits that her bail may be cancelled Besides the fact that there is no positive evidence before me to show of what character the respondents 2 and 3 are, the ground urged is not sufficient for the cancellation of bail. The concession granted to her does not seem to have been misused and she being a women under the law is entitled to the grant of bail. This application, being without merits, is, therefore, dismissed in limine.

2. It has been brought to my notice that in spite of clear direction by this Court to the Investigating Agency to put in challan in the Court as early as possible, the Investigating Agency has not yet sub mitted the challan to the Court concerned hay be that the Investigating Agency was not aware of the order of this Court. That direction is repeated and the copy of the order be sent to the S.H.O. concerned with a clear direction that if the order of this Court is not complied with within 15 days, then suitable action would be taken against the person found guilty of non‑compliance of the order of the Court.

S. G. D. Bail maintained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Alipur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP وکلاء ڈائریکٹری

پاکستان کا لیگل ٹیکنالوجی پلیٹ فارم اور تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری جو کلائنٹس، وکلاء، لاء فرمز اور بار ایسوسی ایشنز کو آپس میں جوڑتا ہے۔

رابطہ کریں

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. جملہ حقوق محفوظ ہیں۔