MST. TANVEER FATIMA versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN
Article 12 Damages Act (IX of 1908), Article 113 agreed to sell the plaintiff's specific performance suit to the contract in this case, and the plaintiff agreed to buy the suit property on the sale issue, the plaintiff was entitled to most of the pay orders. The plaintiff considered the sale in full, the plaintiff was in possession of the property and the defendant acknowledged the receipt of the full consideration of the sale and the defendant acknowledged that the plaintiff was part of the contract in the sale. Was handed down even though it was provided that the defendant would conduct the sale. In favor of the plaintiff within six months from the date of the agreement, but it was stated that the deadline for the agreement was not made in the sale of the contract so that the first part of Article 113 of the Limitation Act 1908 would not be rejected by the plaintiff. What was the agreement to perform its part of the obligation until the lawsuit was filed, Plaintiff was on oath with the assistance of the necessary documents and the plaintiff failed to infringe the contents of the plaintiff suit as prayed Was gone
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Khoski lawyer