Find a Lawyer

IJAZ AHMED LARIK versus CHAIRMAN, NADRA HEADQUARTERS, ISLAMABAD

RR 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5, 6 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Removal of Section 4, Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000), Section 3, 5 , 6, 7, 10 to 11 and the dismissal of the service tribunal was imposed on the appellant on charges of unauthorized absence of duty and non-interest in public works. Rule 1973 At the time when the Service (Special Powers) Withholding Ordinance 2000 was already enacted and under the newly enacted Ordinance under Section 11 it was stated that the ordinance had a greater effect on all existing laws, circumstances. In the, there were actions against the appellant. The appellant was denied the right to dispute serious charges against him, which can only be determined through regular investigation as provided under removal from the service (Special Government Ordinance, 2000 by Misuse of Law The appellant was reinstated to the job against the appellant on the day he was dismissed from the directive that the de novo trial be executed in accordance with the provisions for strict removal of service against the appellant.) Ordinance, 2000 best advocate from Orakzai lawyer