Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASIN versus NOVARTIS PHARMA (PAKISTAN) LTD., KARACHI THROUGH AUTHORITIES

Sections 2 (XXX), 46 and 47 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (i) and application of removal of Section O12 jobs, rehabilitation of employees. The High Court complaint related to the appeal was dismissed by the appellant against the labor court's order to terminate his services because the appellant as a medical information officer was not an appellant as a worker. MC was a pharmacy and was highly qualified, initially involved. As a Medical Information Officer in the organization and consequently promoted to the position of Senior Information Medical Officer, it was his duty to go to the doctors and chemists to introduce the company's products and through the company Appellant. Also provide information on prepared medicines. In other words, being a sales representative and with respect to a sales representative, it was well established that he did not come to Defie as a lant worker or worker of the labor of the appellant, complained of it. The request was rightfully rejected and is not workable. \ R \ n immigration advocates from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer