MST. DILSHAD AKHTAR versus HAJI MALIK AZEEM MAHMOOD .
O 11, R 2 times off 0, R 2, the implementation of the CPC scope may impose such a restriction, where the plaintiff was aware of the facts and stated the same to the plaintiff, but to the extent that he relieved Did not claim the facts are not in the knowledge of the plaintiff. If they were left out, they would not be attracted to this bar. The question, whether the facts were in the knowledge of the plaintiff at the time of filing the case, can be determined only after establishing the principle of the issue and its evidence on the principles.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Dhatmal lawyer
