Find a Lawyer

NASEEM AKHTAR ALIAS ASGHAR versus STATE

Definitions of Sections 302 (b), 109 and 34 of the evidence as to the nature of the injury as a matter of ambiguity do not relate to the recovery of residents of the area eligible for the crime. The charge was against the accused / appellants. In the dark of the night, the murder of four men in search of women's hands for marriage was allegedly the cause of the trial court's commission of crime and the accused is sentenced to death. This happened in the darkness of night. That there was a dispute between the ocular account and medical evidence; there were no eyewitnesses at the time of the incident. The witnesses were involved because of previous hostility and the crime scene cannot be recovered from the scene. The witnesses did not have any serious animosity or illicit desire from the accused so that they could be involved in a false case. Despite the fact that they are being subjected to a lengthy investigation, no material contradiction can be brought to the record in their statements, if the intrinsic value of a witness's contradictory evidence was not shaken, his statement Cannot be ruled out for minor discrepancies. The incident happened in the dark, but the light source (lantern) was never challenged. One of the suspects was closely related to both eyewitnesses and the other was known to witnesses before, so they were identified by eyewitnesses. It was never the Lady Doctor who performed them. Post-mortem report of the three dead women stated that in addition to the wounds of the fire, there were also lace Lady Doctor mentioned the wounds as unknown wounds but us immigration advocates from Mehmood Kot lawyer