Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ براہ راست قابل اعتماد وکیل تک رسائی
ابھی وکیل سے بات کرنی ہے؟

صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء تک کی براہِ راست رابطہ تفصیلات حاصل کریں اور کال یا واٹس ایپ کے ذریعے موزوں قانونی ماہر سے رابطہ کر کے اپنا معاملہ پورے اعتماد کے ساتھ آگے بڑھائیں۔

☎ فون اور واٹس ایپ تک رسائی ⚖ تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری 🔒 محفوظ ادائیگی
⚡ صرف 1000 روپے میں 10 وکلاء سے رابطہ کریں
ایک بار ادائیگی کریں۔ اپنی قانونی ضرورت کے مطابق وکلاء کے رابطہ نمبرز کھولیں۔

MALIK ANWARUL HAQ versus EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD


Regulation 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Lokos positivity, the application of the principle of application was temporarily promoted to higher status, because promotion of promotion under Regulation 3 of the Recruitment and Service Regulations of the Evacuee Trust Property Board, 1984. Was banned. , 50% could be made only through development and 50% through initial appointment, so the provisional development given to the applicant was returned. The applicant had raised that the temporary development was made by the authorities on the basis of the principle of locus pensity. Could not be called back. The protection of the accuracy of recruitment and service rules of the IQAE Trust Property Board, 1984, is admissible as long as there is no proper basis for promoting the purpose of the law and not in the public interest. As such, the facts of an individual case will not be sufficient to preserve such a seat, nor will the terms of the Provisional Temporary Promotion Order nor the promotion ban be contained in the recruitment and service rules of the Einhocus Trust Property Board, 1984. Can serve as a sufficient basis for neglecting reservations. The fact is that the provisional promotion order was implemented on the results which led to the satisfactory work of the promoter for more than four years. Applicant has the valid expectation to retain his post in addition to the post - that is, a temporary promotion order has been issued by the competent authority as the High Court has directed that the Department's Promotion Committee be served as soon as possible Will make the decision. The High Court directed further to consider the case of the applicant for development on the merit

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of supreme court advocates from FR DI Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP وکلاء ڈائریکٹری

پاکستان کا لیگل ٹیکنالوجی پلیٹ فارم اور تصدیق شدہ وکلاء ڈائریکٹری جو کلائنٹس، وکلاء، لاء فرمز اور بار ایسوسی ایشنز کو آپس میں جوڑتا ہے۔

رابطہ کریں

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. جملہ حقوق محفوظ ہیں۔