Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus MULAZIM HUSSAIN

Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the evidence-related testimony was delayed by the FIR overnight trial by the High Court's accused, justifying the dismissal. The two witnesses were relatives of the complainant and they were not injured during the incident, so there was no Shariah guarantee or judicial sanctity of their presence at the time of the incident. Both witnesses were close to the deceased. There were relatives and if they were present on the spot they must have tried to catch up. Such delay in filing an FIR has led the High Court to rightly conclude that eyewitness testimony was obtained and that the witness was persuaded to become a witness of the incident. The accused was from the accused and he was also accused of enmity with the accused. The prosecution has alleged that the evidence of such eyewitnesses needs some coordination to ensure that they speak the truth. The court did not commit any illegal acts, while the accused were acquitted for strict reasons. Was refused t family advocate from Arifwala lawyer