TAJ MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Pre-arrest bail, Section 498 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (ii), 337F (i), 114, 147, 148 and 504, indicate that the specific type of injury The role was assigned to the co-accused. He was charged with the accused and the other accused were kept in column II of the challan by the police conviction, besides which they did not come under the ban in section 497, challaned the CCPC case. Was filed and prosecuted by the Magistrate State. The lawyer had no objection to the validity of the interim pre-arrest bail, the former bail was granted by the accused party as the contents of the FIR show that legal proceedings cannot be ruled out. Under the circumstances, the interim pre-arrest bail of the accused was approved, however
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Morgah lawyer