Find a Lawyer

BAKHT ZADA versus MST. JOOMREZA

Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction for dissolution of marriage, restoration of marriage, restitution of minor and restitution of marital rights Respondent (wife) for dissolution. The suit was filed against the petitioner, restitution of the marriage and the custody of the minor, while the petitioner (husband) filed a case against the defendant for the restoration of marital rights, both suits were filed by the petitioner. Partial dissolution of the marriage, restoration of the Dover and restoration of the restoration was ordered to allow for the custody of the minor daughter and her The petition was denied and the case filed for restoration of marital rights by the applicant was dismissed by the decision of the Family Court and the order passed by the Family Court was upheld in the High Court constitutional jurisdiction. Was completely arbitrary. In appropriate cases, the High Court can be ruled out because of constitutional jurisdiction, it has to be seen if the tribunal or court acts without jurisdiction, or in any such case against any relevant law or law. The infringer cannot re-examine the evidence because the appellate court's duty to substantiate the evidence was made according to law. No irregularity or judicial error was identified by the applicant in which the High Court Tribunal was invited to intervene in the judicial jurisdiction to decide a matter; Or was able to make the wrong decision. False, making a tribunal decision without any legal decision immigration advocate from Wana lawyer