Find a Lawyer

SALES TAX APPEAL NO.Q-251 OF 2003, DECIDED ON 9TH FEBRUARY, 2005 versus SALES TAX APPEAL NO.Q-251 OF 2003, DECIDED ON 9TH FEBRUARY, 2005

Appeal to Section 46 of the Appellate Tribunal Principles of Natural Justice, showcased notice of the appellant's violation, in which they were declared numerous irregularities and, on the basis of the alleged irregularities, against several provisions of the Sales Tax Act. The appellant was accused of infringement, the appellant's records were in the possession of the 1990's, the appellant sought time to submit a reply to the showcase notice and also demanded the supply of his records, but the department representative The matter was decided by the department before the record was delivered to the appellant. This record was not made available to the appellant (the lure of the reasoning proceedings and the controversial order against the appellant were presented. Parsif's validity should not be heard by anyone and all material before the trial Based on the allegations made, they should be presented to the accused). The proceedings against the appellant, in the circumstances inconsistent with the procedure, no suitable opportunity was provided for the appellant before the Adjudication Officer case. Represent your view in front of an unfair trial; inappropriate order was set aside The case was presented for the De Novo trial after giving the appellant and the appellant a fair hearing. advocates from More kunda lawyer