Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUHAMMAD ZARAT KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 2B, 3A, 3E, 16, 19, 25, 32 (A) (B) (C), 156 (1), (10 = A), (14) ), (14A), (77), (82), 168, 178, 171 and 195C section RO450 (I) / 2001, dated 18 6 2001 section RO 509 (I) / 97, date 8 7 1997 Section RO 698 (I) / 02, dated 9-10 2002 National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 25 Guarantee, Dismissal Liability Grant Claims Unused Customs Waiver under the Customs Act, 1969 The defendant / applicant, filed by the Customs Authority, filed against the four FIs, alleging that he was involved in an unacceptable customs waiver claim, and that through fraudulent and fraudulent exports. The misuse of the TRE has damaged the public exchequer. And that the goods / containers intended for export were not contained in the export article in which the accused's request for bail was heard when the accused was prosecuted and the accused was connected to the crime through prosecution. The investigation is still pending. Progress was alleged; he was ready to pay for alleged theft of customs duty. The charge was fraudulent in claiming an exemption after export. That under section 32 (a) (b) of the Customs Act, 1969, the crime allegedly required by the accused was to be further increased if he paid the duty as well as the amount of tax paid. Paid Under the section 195C of the Customs Act, 1969, the accused shall be appointed to the Central Board of Revenue for the appointment of an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) committee to resolve customs duties, dues, waivers, waivers, fines or penalties. Had to apply. The case of the accused being a civil citizen in view of Sections 32 (A) (B) and 195 C Customs Act, 1969; advocates from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer