Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAVED versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) definition of evidence The benefit of the doubt was not directly and personally related to the purpose set forth by the prosecution No evidence was brought on record to dispose of any conspiracy between the accused and the accompanying accused. Was acquitted and, in the absence of the personal motive of the accused against the accused and the accused against the victim, his acquittal was not challenged by the complaining party or state before the High Court, confidently believing It can be argued that the accused has no clear cause for the murders. The crime was explained in the FIR. There were serious doubts about the truth of the reason stated by the prosecution for the presence of the victim at the relevant time, the prosecution's story was sufficient to explain the presence of the victim at the relevant time. Incredible, in the circumstances the prosecution presented the three witnesses in the case, they had a deep connection, besides being a late witness and opportunity witness, they were extraordinary witnesses. The occurrence of the incident was located several acres away from the usual residence of all the witnesses and the cause of the deceased's presence and the presence of witnesses at the relevant location was not determined by the prosecutor with any degree of certainty, In view of the enmity between the parties, the statements of the prosecution's witnesses could not be relied upon without seeking independent collusion or support, the prosecution had failed to prove its intended motive. The 30-bore pistol from the suspect was legally unforgettable as no crime was recovered from the scene of the incident so that the alleged murder property advocates from Gakhar Mandi lawyer