Find a Lawyer

SHAHBAZ AHMAD versus STATE

Section 302 (b) the value of the evidence was not challenged at the time of depletion and at the time of the incident, the accused did not deny that he had fired at the deceased, but requested that the death of the deceased. The prosecution's witnesses gave a straightforward account. The witnesses said the witnesses had no previous wishes, hostility or any complaint against the accused so that they could be included in a false case. Witnesses' statements were supported by medical evidence and the circumstances of the case were confirmed as the matter was reported to the police. Half an hour after the incident proved beyond doubt that the victim lost his life due to the blaze caused by the suspect, while playing cards after losing a game, the victim's control was lost and his Had started abusing the accused, who was about 20 years old at the time. The incident, which had lost control of the accused and caused a single fire on the deceased, led to the sudden outbreak and the fight that led to the victim's abuse. The incident occurred in the heat of the moment the accused was attracted by the provisions of Section IV of Section 300 of the Act, the PPC (old law) was replaced by the accused's offense under section 2302 (b), PPC. From the offense, the offense under Section 2302 (c), PPC, was reduced to ten years, the RI benefit of Section 2 382B, which was already extended to the CCP, was alleged A mountain Yab is a laborer, the amount of compensation was accordingly, reduced from Rs 1,000, 000 to Rs 50,000. immigration advocate from Dinga lawyer