MST. ZEBA versus STATE
Articles 2, 201, ??? & 34 34 Testimony of evidence proved beyond doubt that the motive for the conviction was convincing and trusting in the statements of the prosecution witnesses from the deceased's husband, the accused's husband. The witnesses did not have any enmity with the accused. The accused failed to explain why he also supported his medical evidence; Was taken from her home, defense request was not considered natural. And the defendant could not prove his allegation that he was involved in the case for enmity and motive. The prosecutor, beyond any doubt, proved his case against the accused. The trial court upheld the accused's appeal. Was sentenced. The accused, dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Faisalabad lawyer