Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASIN versus STATE

Definitions of Article 2 (2 (b), 8 evidence8 and reation evidence were deferred and the wife of an accused, two suspects leading to the recovery of aluminum petals) while a third suspect was recovered at the request of the doctor, The victim, who examined the body of the deceased, was found with minor injuries, and three accused received acid burns on different parts of their persons. Most of the injuries were on the victim's wife / wife, It was of such a nature that no one could say that it could have been caused by the suspect throwing acid. The first informant in R. and in his statements under Section 161, CR PC, was suppressed by eyewitnesses. He did not even tell the trial court that the accused, hurling acid on the victim, suffered immediate injuries. I was first mistrusted by the informant and the prosecution witnesses when there were two versions of the incident and even the injured were suppressed, then the benefit of the doubt should be found to the accused and the accused by the trial court. The convicts were kept separate and given the benefit of the doubt, they were acquitted. solicitors from Bahawalpur lawyer