SYED ARIF RAZA versus SYED SABIR RAZA
A. XVIII, R 2 The decision to decide on competence without hearing the arguments was not argued by the court and all that could be said in the language used in R2 of Rule XVIII, was that if the parties were Or their lawyer. The trial court had to give them the opportunity to do so to deal with the arguments. But before hearing the arguments before the case was not necessary, if the arguments were not heard before the decision was made, for the purpose of hearing OXII, R 6, CPC, it would be considered that the conclusion was made at the end of the evidence. The parties, but if the arguments were heard, the stage at which the hearing ended, was the one when the arguments ended.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Gujrat lawyer
