Find a Lawyer

JAN MUHAMMAD KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.

Sections 4, 11, 18, 23 and 54 Land Acquisition Determination of Compensation Compensation The court reference was obtained for the public purpose and the acquisition collector evaluated the compensation received. The landlord had objected to the pickup. The petition and the case were referred to the court under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. After considering the material available on the record, the objection petition was dismissed by the said decision which stated that the collector had already obtained Higher rates were set for the given land and there is no reason. Interfering with the award under reference must provide the Validatie Party with sufficient evidence to claim an increase in compensation so that the award was inadequate, except for a one-year average, and nothing on file considering the potential and future prospects. had gone. In the quest to show its potential and future prospects in the ground, the acquisition was not taken into account while determining the amount of compensation the acquisition collector took into account, including its potential and future prospects. Determined the amount of the appellant's question that the land is on the roadside and can be used for it. Commercial purposes, without any positive effort on their part, did not yield any results. The Commission's report was not excluded for good reasons and there can be no exception because of the acquisition of land. The compensation provided is unimaginable. Will not request interference best advocate from Kumbh lawyer