Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COYS ZONE-II, LAHORE versus MESSRS CRESCENT COTTON AND ALLIED FACTORIES (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE

Estimates of Sections 14, 16 (2) (5) and 17 of the previous year not issuing notice under Section 16 (2) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 Issuing the declaration of assessment order Issei has not filed its Wealth Tax Return file for some years. What, for which the authorities issued a notice under Sections 14 and 17 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, in response to the notice, filed the Wealth Tax Return for the previous years and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal of the Welding Tax Act, 1963 Under Section 16 (5), the Assessment Officer has finalized. An appeal was filed by the Assessment and by a revised diagnostic order for the non-issuance of legal notice under section 16 (2) of the Property Tax Act, 1963, which was issued to the Assisi Place taken by the Authority. Was not made when the notice was taken under Sections 14 and 17 of the Wealth Tax. Act, 1963, was granted, then required to take notice under section 16 (2) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963 under sections 14 and 17 of the Wealth Tax Act 1963 and notice under Section 16 (2) Wealth Tax Act. Was not , 1963 was entirely of two different categories The notice under the previous provisions was merely to compel the reviewer and to obtain the return while the latter category demanded that the notice be presented in support of his return. In order to advance the diagnosis. The issuance of a notice under section 14 or 17 of the Wealth Tax Act 1963 cannot be equal to the legal requirements of Section 16 (2) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963, as the notice under section 16 (2) of the Wealth Tax Act cannot be issued. Due to this, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal properly suspended the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which rejected the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's appeal. jobs for fresh advocates from Chak Sheza lawyer