Find a Lawyer

NAVEED-ULLAH KHAN BHATTI versus DIRECTOR, PUNJAB EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION

Sections 2 (8) (f), 57 (f) and 82 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A. VIII, R11 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Sections 42 and 44 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII) 1967, Section 81 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), challenge to termination of notification issued under Article 25 Provincial Employees Social Security Ordinance, 1965, Plaintiff defendant for maintaining Social Security Department's partnership with Social Security through an announcement suit. Issued notification challenged. Station) Provincial employees did not attract the provisions of the Social Security Ordinance, 1965, so a permanent injunction may be issued in favor of it to prevent the department from taking coercive measures to achieve social security contribution. O. VIII, R11, filed an application under CPC. In the notification issued under the Provincial Employees Social Security Ordinance, 1965, the plaintiff's establishment was regularly mentioned and was unable to be maintained and that the plaintiff was in the past trial court participating in social security and the appellant. The court dismissed the plaintiff's case when the lawyer West Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against him under the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. He had previously been involved in social protection because the department alleges that he could not go beyond the pale of Section 557 of the Social Security Ordinance of the Provincial Employees, a 1938 notice of notification issued by the Department of Defendants. Challenges can only be made if the notification is given more than the authority. Provincial employees through the Social Security Ordinance, 1965 or under this Constitution famous high court advocate from Baroute lawyer