Find a Lawyer

IRFAN AHMAD KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

According to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4 and 199 Constitutional pleadings with the rights of the people were agitated in their favor, claiming to be the occupants of the shops on the basis of legal treaty agreements. Applicants who had filed a constitutional petition by the authorities and on their request to seal the shops mentioned and directed the High Court to seal the said shops, there was no law to sell such shops. Was. The same was done by the authorities, who could greatly assist with the provisions of section 5 of the West Pakistan Government Land and Buildings Ordinance, 1966, which was directed to evict unauthorized occupants. A written order was issued for. Such person should be instructed to vacate the house / building within the stipulated period, which is considered in the process of recovering the occupied occupation by section 5 (). The car was not authorized by the authorities, but it was not something that enjoys the protection of the law, and it was the right of everyone to act according to the law. As the citizen states in Article 4 of the Constitution that the occupation of the shop applicants was accepted, it is imperative to deprive them of any use or occupation, which would be supported by the contemporary law or otherwise. Will be completely unauthorized and violated by the provisions of Article 4 of the Constitution which were declared completely unnecessary by the authorities and on the offer which could not be contested by the High Court. Sale ask a advocate free from Qazi Ahmed lawyer