Find a Lawyer

MIRZA BASHIR AHMED versus HABIB

Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction Nature's discretionary material facts cover findings from the court The principle of equity was given to the applicant to come to court with unclean hands and a petition filed by one of the applicants. Was gone To the extent stated above, the defendant was dismissed by the Additional Commissioner. Further appeals before the Board of Revenue were unsuccessful and the order of the Additional Commissioner was intact The constitutional petition was filed that before the constitutional petition was filed the order of the Board of Revenue was repealed and proceeded without legal authority. The petition was filed under section 8 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1967, a review petition before the Board of Revenue under which the relief sought in the constitutional petition was already approved, the review petition was filed in the constitutional petition. The facts were not disclosed under which the claim for impact relief was made S. Article 199 of the Constitution was an arbitrary relief and could not be accepted, relieving itself of the truth, when it approached the court with unclean hands as the applicant immediately concealed the material facts, Therefore, with unclean hands, the court had arrived and was not entitled to any recapitulation. immigration advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer