Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHABBIR versus STATE

Defendant was charged with defining Section 302 (b) / 149 evidence when the incident took place when the FIR contained a child under the age of 18 who was charged with common felony charges against all the accused and one of the prosecution And the witness confessed that the fire had caused the suspect to kill no one. The motive was not against the accused even though the suspect was allegedly equipped with a mouse. During the investigation, a pistol was recovered from him. The forensic science lab was also not sent to combat crime cases. The accused, who was not declared to be the cause of any injury, was already acquitted, the accused was minor, his conviction under section 2302 (b) was not legal, on the occasion it was proved by the presence of the accused. It does not appear that his active participation in the incident has not been proved o] doubt in the circumstances jobs for fresh advocates from Rajanpur lawyer