AMJAD JAVED versus JFC
Article 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the witness witnesses, Amendment of the defendant's request was that the witnesses mentioned in the schedule were won by the plaintiff, and they were not willing to be dismissed by the judge, Family. Court dismisses Plaintiff \ 's request on the ground that he failed to rationalize such an amendment at the alien stage. And that he did not indicate how and when he learned of the victory over his witnesses, the Family Court had acted very technically if the defendant had opposed the petition and the Family Court. By allowing the defendant to modify the witness's schedule, no sky could fall. Rejecting this, the defendant had paved the way for the matter to be reached by referring to the High Court, otherwise, the burden of expenditure on the defendants at the trial stage could have been settled easily, hi. The court accepted the constitutional petition, set aside the plaintiff's order and allowed the defendant to amend. According to the revised schedule, payment of witnesses is subject to the payment of Rs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Sara e Naurang lawyer