Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR ALI, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) AND AL-HAJ FIROZ-UD-DIN versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR ALI, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) AND AL-HAJ FIROZ-UD-DIN

Sections 13, 19, 32, 156 (1) (a) (10a), (14), (44), (45), (46), (50), (51), (59), (61) , (62), (77), (81), (82), (86), (90), (91) and 194 Appellant Tribunal Appellant / Importers of fraud on bills relating to registration change / tampering. Appeals for fines were fraudulently / corrupted by the facts / details and clearance of the imported goods by them on entry and fraudulent entry bills and, in the case of bonding, X bonding with no duty and tax payment goods. Were able to fix otherwise the import records of such goods revealed that the clearing agents and The appellant / importers, due to customs staff misrepresentation of the facts / details of the goods, wrongly submitted the incorrect / incomplete invoice, invalidating the value of the imported goods and keeping the details and quantity of the goods confusing. Do not provide any details. After hiding the right amount of imported goods, showcasing notices and the full opportunity of hearing after issuing the case, appellants were fined, minutes after the original test report revealed that Scrotney had revealed that some individuals had ink removal. The original quantity was tampered with and the quantity was inserted in place, though an attempt was made to remove the quantity. , But the original figures were not completely deleted and could be read very clearly, not all, but some of the entries were tampered with in the investigation report, not the criminal evidence in the rigorous criminal investigation of the case. The prosecution could not prove criminal proceedings against some appellants / accused. The court online advocate from Kahror Pacca lawyer