IMTIAZ SALEEM AHMAD versus CITIBANK THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER
Sections 9, 10 and 17 were passed by the General Clause Act (X of 1897), a decision of satisfaction of the Section 24 Banking Court was not in accordance with the law; After the 24A increase, public officials were obliged to decide the dispute between the parties following a mental request. The High Court accepted the appeal and fixed the order, resulting in the application of the mind in accordance with the law. Subsequent to the bankruptcy court's decision for a new suit and leave will be considered pending.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Jhudo lawyer
