Find a Lawyer

FAKHRUDDIN KHAN SYED versus MST. SURRYIA SULTANA

Sections 2 (f) (j), 15 (2) (ii) (vii) and 21 eviction requests were made by the respondents against the decision of the landlord and tenant of the rental controller case that one of the under-lying residential respondents. Was the parent of And upon his father's death, his share of the premises depended on his legal inheritance, which was the daughter of the defendant, and being the representative of all of the defendant's legal heirs, he had to pay rent to his appellant / tenants. Sends notice to the appellant / tenant for Failure to pay rent / tender rent, default in payment of rent and for the personal need of the respondent / landlord, the appellant / tenants denied the relationship of the landlord and the tenant, between the parties, Who has accepted the request through the rental controller. An appeal has been filed against the rent controller's justification decision where there is no rental agreement between the parties, the law will hold that when a person who does not own the premises occupies any part of it. Means and had no title assigned to the premises owner's profits, then such person would, by law fiction, become the landlord of the landlord appellant and it was stated that he was the mother of the deceased defendant. The widow has tenants. However, the defendant claimed that he was one of the legal heirs of the deceased father who jointly owned the premises alongside his mother. According to the fact that the premises were actually the joint property of the father and the defendant's mother, after his father's death, he had become one of the co-owners of the premises and had filed suit against the appellant / tenant. online advocate from Theing Jattan More lawyer