COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus MESSRS HAFIZ ABDUL WAHEED & BROTHERS
Sections 50 (4), 80 (c), 136 (2) and 143 are not considered as supply to the High Court credit queries The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in granting the credit cell its purpose. The supply for cannot be considered. Section 80 (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, when the tax was already deducted under section 50 (4) of the said Act and also temporarily punished for filing a statement under section 143 of the Ordinance. Was not imposed. Order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal No order was recorded on the request for credit sale of section 80 (c) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. This question about the law can only be said if it is a legislature. Done In the present case after the Tribunal was raised and ruled before the Tribunal, neither the nature of the credit sales was discussed in the matter nor the issue whether section 80 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 ( C) why the clause was not attracted in the matter of Assisi. The matter, or at least the reasons, which were weighed with the tribunal during the decision of easement, were not before the High Court as it was not in a position to decide the legality otherwise, due to these questions the Tribunal was in a state of circumstance. Should not have been cited.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Rahimyar Khan lawyer