Find a Lawyer

STATE versus KOTAY

Section 33 / ? 9/2 302/4 324/34 34 Definition of Evidence The payment of the Dait Qasima, which means and applies to the accused for retaliation, has been applied by the tenant killers and although with the survivor's relatives. The others present on the scene also knew the culprit, but they were not deliberately imposing the blame on them. The third method of embezzlement in a criminal case was when there was no direct or circumstantial evidence available under the Shariah law. In any murder case, the burden of payment of the money, some necessary conditions had to be fulfilled by the trial court before passing an order of this kind, provided that the place from which the body was found was fulfilled. Inquiries as to whether or not. In such cases the voice of the victim cannot be heard / heard by the occupants of the adjoining area and even where the body was found from has been done. Apart from the importance of benefiting the locals, the fact that the alleged incident did not generally take place, the trial court did not agree with any other condition which was either untreated or I do not deliberately accuse the assailant of the deceased's legal heritage; the matter could not be cured in which the money should be paid by the state incident. The injured witnesses saw the incident with their own eyes, they could identify if the perpetrators were brought before them. If so, how to guide the state in such a situation joss property advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer