ISLAM-UD-DIN versus STATE
Article 199 Criminal adultery (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/16 Constitutional Petition The FIR was withdrawn and the proceedings in the trial court against it were stated by the Constitutional Court itself. Action pending. The comments submitted by the Session Report / Respondent revealed that the challan was presented in this case and the decision of the case is pending, the applicants, in the circumstances, applying under Section 265 K, CR P, C In case they had any other effective AD available. Which can be filed before the trial court as there was other appropriate / effective treatment available to the applicants so no justification for filing a constitutional application was available.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Swat lawyer
