MUHAMMAD LATIF versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL
Section 17 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), filed with the eviction order for the specific performance of a contract to sell a damaged property by a tenant, was the only effect of the landlord being unlimited The fruits of the withdrawal order cannot be excluded. Implementation of the withdrawal order, which was finalized, cannot be legally objected to in this way if the tenant ultimately succeeds in litigation, the property will be in compliance with the decree as the owner. The possession may be handed over to him.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Satyana Bangla lawyer
