SARDAR ALIAS SARDARA versus STATE
Section 404040/435 / / 99 Q Law Shardt (Sun of 1984 of Ten), Article 137 Seeking Prosecutor's Witness by Re-Review Request The doctor's re-examination was allowed, absence of petitioner's lawyer I was re-examined by the female doctor, especially when the request for a postponement was made by such a lawyer, the applicant's confession was true that he had condemned the un-heard state lawyer even though he had Pointed out that the right to cross-examination was reserved, but the fact is that in the absence of a lawyer, this method of re-examination Run evidence had breached Article 137, was recorded in 1984 but not in the narrative re-examination Q & A format. Which was a clear violation of Article 137 of the Martyrdom of the Law, the court orders below 1984 would not stand in the eyes of the law. Hitch demanded the High Court's intervention in exercising its revised jurisdiction, ordering the Lady Doctor's inquiry through a seed order so that the applicant's lawyer had the opportunity to be heard, according to the law-forming procedure Be checked according to.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Patika lawyer