RAJANA COTTON FACTORY (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus THE BANK OF PUNJAB THROUGH MANAGER
Sections 9 (5), 10 (2) and 12 of the nature of the service Legal service 1 The Banking Court defended the application by seeking summons by publishing a notice in the newspapers on 3 and 2002 and registered post on 13 3 2002. Allowed to sue for non-leave. Within the required time under Clause 12, it was claimed by the applicants that they were not served properly, the Banking Court rejected it in the case under the Financial Institutions (Maintenance) Ordinance 2001. Defendant's services were offered in any form offering fair and reasonable service which was issued on 13 2002 2002 and the required period was not ended 30 30 days, when 4 the 2002 2002 on on 2002 It was of no use if the decree was passed, because the publication in the newspapers came into effect from 1 1 1 effect. 2002 2002, the period for filing a leave for defense began on the same date
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Mangowal lawyer
