Find a Lawyer

SYED WAQAS NOOR BUKHARI THROUGH SYED NOOR HUSSAIN SHAH BUKHARI versus BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR

Section 3 (2), Bahauddin Zakaria University Act (III of 1975), Section 32 Lantra Court Appellant who was denied entry to the Electrical Engineering Department of the University, filed a constitutional petition against the decision of the admission committee which In Beer, dismissal, he filed an appeal under section 3 of the Law Reform Ordinance 1972, but withdrew the appellant by the Appellate Admissions Committee before the Appellate Admissions Committee withdrew the appeal to benefit from the remedy. Went, he challenged such a decision in the constitutional petition, saying the application has been dismissed, the appeal The complainant had filed an intra-court appeal on the basis that it was objected to the order challenging the constitutional petition by the Appellate Admissions Committee, the decision rendered by a single High Court judge pursuant to Section 3 (2). Cannot be challenged under Providence. Appellant's view of the Law Reform Ordinance, 1972, was that the Appellate Admissions Committee holds that the appeal filed by him before the Appellate Admissions Committee would not be accepted as lawful, not as a remedy available under the law. It is understood that admission to various programs of the University was informed by the rules and regulations published in the prospectus of Bahauddin Zakaria University for the year 2003. Minimum eligibility and admission test procedure for admission to various faculties in the University If the applicant has a complaint, he may prefer to appeal to the Appellate Admissions Committee of the University under Rule 13. Bahauddin Zakaria University Act, 1975, illegally appeals to the Intra-Court law websites from Tharparkar lawyer