MUMTAZ HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD BAKHSH
A. XXXVII, R2 Pro Note and Receipt Procedure for obtaining debt based on the note, the suit order was charged with legal proceedings, fraud and misrepresentation, as well as the defendant. A statement has been clearly submitted by. It was concluded that the conscience and receipt were not denied signatures and thumb impressions No independent neutral evidence was brought to the record to show that the fraud was obtained by the plaintiff through fraud and coercion. And the submission of the plaintiff was supported by the plaintiff's testimony, which excluded the defendant's payment and signatures / thumbprints, and was not lightened in any cross-examination, in the circumstances of the appeal. Was deleted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Bhirya Road lawyer
