OFFICE INCHARGE, MARKET COMMITTEE AND OTHERS versus ARSALAH KHAN BROTHERS AND OTHERS
Article 12 (2), 79, OI, R 9 and O XVII, R 3 In the nominations of the parties against the parties involved and the bailing of the court, it was decided that the appropriate parties were entitled to the defendants under Section 12. The source is before the court. (2), the CDPC did not justify such an interpretation as it had enacted, but the defendants would not be public officials and the suit on a technical matter related to misinterpretation of non-parties. Could not be excluded. The request was accepted by the claimant with instructions to file an amendment. Section 79, Title by joining the parties to the CPC requirement
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Bannu lawyer