Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE

Sections 2?2 (b) and 7 337f (i) Appreciating the evidence The witnesses were natural witnesses of the incident who testified to the credibility and reliability of the incident and filed an FIR on behalf of the complainant without delay. Who was the real brother. The accused gun was recovered from the suspect's custody, which coincided with the empty crime case. The ocular testimony proved from the medical evidence, that the eyewitnesses could not relate to the recovery of the crime weapon and the narcissist presented by the complainant. Make their evidence unbelievable when their presence at the time of the incident was not open to any suspicion The case of the single accused was at the time of the day when the witnesses were fully acquainted with the accused. best advocate from Kandiaro lawyer