AURANGZEB versus THE STATE-
Section 9 (b) (c) of evidence is investigated in this case in a very superficial manner without the use of the mind and without the adherence to the law and the rules, in addition to the evidence of the prosecution, the statement of a prosecution witness Also, stay quiet. How the samples were separated from the bulk of the drug export. Throughout the evidence, it was alleged that large quantities of drugs were recovered from the accused, but due to the lack of investigation and the method of investigating the matter, the court would only investigate. Review the quantity of drugs recovered, which turned out to be a drug prosecution witness who was the property property supervisor, clearly stated that before the narcotics were destroyed, he made Section 516A, CRPC. In compliance, two parcels were prepared and one was taken of Kerosene and one Latin opium altogether.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Pasroor lawyer