ASGHAR ALI KHAN versus MST. FEROZA BEGUM
Article 35 Respondent A poor and ridiculous argument by a court lawyer advised such lawyer to be brief and confine his arguments to the points of the law, despite such advice. Several warnings were issued to put forward costs. The court wasted more than an hour, which could have been more beneficial in hearing and settling other matters listed in the day's cause list, as the High Court charged defendant with compensation under Section 35A, CPC Directed to pay Rs. 3,000. , Which directed the petitioner's statement to be submitted to the High Court Medical Fund.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer
