THE STATE versus DR. MUMTAZ AHMED MIR
There was ample record available to link the accused in the trial of sections 171717 and ?99 to the allegations of guilt against him. The trial court, the accused in the trial proceeded to stop the proceedings when it was almost almost concluded that no less than 10 prosecution witnesses and 2 court witnesses were registered in the case and the prosecutor did not close the evidence. Was because two more witnesses, including the complainant, have yet to be examined. After discussing the already recorded evidence, the trial court proceedings to acquit the defendant reflected the trial court's reluctance to conclude a case that could appear for a period of approximately nine days. Evidence from witnesses may be recorded from time to time.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Rawalpindi lawyer