Find a Lawyer

FAQEER HUSSAIN versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL POLICE

RR 4 (1) (B), 5 and 6 Circular No. 2661 2706 / DISC 1, Dated 21 12 1995, Para 9 (1) (v) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Constitution The complete absence of mandatory retirement duty from Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3), the Service Tribunal, has sustained such conviction that the Job had deliberately excluded itself from the disciplinary proceedings, though The Authority made every effort to obtain the showcase notice because of this, but in vain the Inquiry Officer found the public servant guilty of such a charge, for the purpose of unlawful absence due to mismanagement. The tactic was to prove that a public servant was dismissed for two different occasions because of his absence from the job, that he was not interested in the service at least. Public importance involved Supreme Court dismisses plea and denies leave to appeal list of supreme court advocates from Risalpur lawyer