IMTIAZ ALI versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER
Section 154 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), 5 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition The first FIR was dismissed and a second FIR recording was sought in which it stated An FIR recording was sought for the incident. Its application is linked to the constitutional request and the termination of the FIR filed by Section HO of the relevant police station under Section 302/34, PPC, allegedly on their statement to both parties on their version. The case remained and the case was made up of version two, ie, police vs informant; therefore, it was important for the court to decide that both versions be on the record, because the complainant did not know which of the two was right. It was reported that the dispute cannot be decided in the realm of factual investigation by the High Court and even the High Court That a decision in this regard may be biased to any party's case, the FIR already registered by the police in any case with the investigating agency as well as those involved or the other FIR Will deprive the individuals of its beneficial use. Thus, the decision was left open by a competent court where the parties would have the liberty to prove the truth or falsity of the earlier and subsequent FIR rupees, and the fact that the earlier FIR was also lodged a complaint. Whether or not it was filed by the police, the police directed to file another FIR, as reported by the complainant in his writings and also to investigate both copies, which were necessary to correct the responsibility. Bala m
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer