Find a Lawyer

SHAMSUL TABRAIZ versus FAZLI QADIR

The trial court dismissed the cases for making Articles 6 and 13, but the appellate court did not allow the appeal, nor did the plaintiff's lawyer tell the plaintiff's lawyer in his statement, the date, time and place. When did he make the talib? And did not disclose the name of the person to whom he allegedly obtained the sale, and was not presented to anyone to prove how he obtained the sale, in the circumstances, The plaintiffs failed to prove the defendants' information regarding the sale and the names of those who had sought the defendants, completing section 13 (3) of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987 Will not meet the requirements of the plaintiff, the plaintiff also failed to prove the service of the notice of Talib e. The plaintiff failed to prove that he had made the students in accordance with the law, the trial court properly dismissed the appellate court without discussing any evidence. Appeal against the trial court's decision, passed through a non-speech decision consisting of only four lines, without the appellate court's appreciation of the material available on the record and legal position, the High Court exercised its amended jurisdiction. Put aside. property advocate from Shogram lawyer