Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood Ordinance (VI 1979 1979 1979)), sections (17 ()), 2 and 24 were recovered from the accused on the spot and by the investigating officer. Recovery was obtained regularly through a memo. And the blank strip was also recovered from the site and the video memo was saved and both pistols and vacancies were sent to the forensic science laboratory where they were regularly contested and were said to be exhibited according to evidence from the laboratory. In which a case of pistols and vacancies was presented to the court. The non-production of independent eyewitness witnesses who were attracted to the opportunity after the incident took place under neutral and one-handed conviction, would not have been dealt with in the prosecution's case, because the prosecution's witnesses were the only eyewitnesses who testified throughout. There were natural witnesses to the incident and there was no evidence. The purpose of making false accusations of the accused is to say that one witness was the servant of the deceased and the other was his companion and the heir's presence on the spot was natural, especially when one of them was injured during the incident. Eyewitnesses expressed confidence that eyewitnesses immediately arrested the suspect at the scene of the incident, witnesses said, adding that whatever was witnessed by them. In no case did the attempt to improve or improve the contradictions identified by the defense in this case were not material and in no way had it had any adverse effect on the litigation, witnesses lied. Or there was no purpose to replace the real suspect. Prosecutor's Go law firms from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer