Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD TABASSAM versus MST. GULSHAN ARA

Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction The concurrent results of the above courts in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be successfully accepted, unless the courts exceed the jurisdiction, acting without any jurisdiction or results. If not based on any evidence, the constitutional petition would not lie to challenge any order. The evidence in this case is not properly appreciated because the finding of the facts of the jurisdiction authorized by the courts cannot be bothered simply because another view on the same evidence is possible in its constitutional jurisdiction. Cannot sit as a court. The appeals and the fact finding recorded by the courts below could not be substituted as the matter should be decided by the courts which have been decided with jurisdiction. advocate for immigration from Machi Goth lawyer