Find a Lawyer

GENERAL MANAGER, PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL, THE MALL, LAHORE/RAWALPINDI versus FARHAT IQBAL

Indiscriminate dismissal of section 25 service Proper investigation found the employee guilty of the charges and consequently he was dismissed from the job, it was clearly acknowledged in his appearance before the Labor Court. Charge sheet and inquiry notices have been received but did not appear to be involved in the inquiry proceedings because his non-participation in the inquiry proceedings was intentional and he cannot deliberately place a premium on his mistake of absence from the inquiry process. Was, also, a notice of complaint filed by the employee to the result obtained by the Labor Court from time to time. Was stopped. And Labor, after the appellate tribunal considered the evidence on record, was appropriate and based on the correct definition of evidence and, on the contrary, the High Court's contentious decision was not sustained, the Supreme Court turned the petition over, Allowed, reinstated the judgment of the High Court and the decision of the Labor Court and the Appellate Tribunal online advocate from Tarmatan lawyer