NAZIRAN BIBI versus CITI BANK N.A.
Section 19 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), A XXI, R 69 Specific Relief Act (1 of 1877), Section 12 On the intervention of the appellant Lotus Standley of the appellant suit in connection with the auction sale of the mortgaged property In connection with the sale of the auction restraint agreement, the appellant's contract filed a claim that the decedent had agreed to sell the mortgaged property and considered it with the appellant's ownership of the property. The bulk of the money was received and it was to be deposited. O XXI, an attempt was made to stop the auction under R 69, the lender of the CPC judge resisted the application and refused to enforce any such agreement, the application under A XXI, R 69, c. The PC was dismissed by the Executive Court on the ground that the Appellant had no Luxury standing. Enter the same file as if no legal title had been transferred in favor of the appellant if the litigation hearing was set up he would establish the app. According to the terms set out between the judgment and the lenders, the Alliant was entitled to indemnify him. Consequently, the right of title will be returned to this agreement, although this order may be passed at a later date. , The appellant offered to pay the outstanding balance to fulfill the bank's decree, there was no objection to the verdict of the verdict, if the declared debt was satisfied and the property could be avoided at auction. Appellant's rights and respect for the disputed property of the judgment will not have any effect and the decision will not be civil Will of the specific
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Gujar Khan lawyer