Find a Lawyer

SYED ZAFAR ALI SHAH versus HAJI SANA ULLAH

The applicant was given the right to collect section 3 (IV) and the second scheduled entry fee, but later due to another agreement between the applicant and the defendant, such right was taken by the defendant and stated that the contract Confirmed and signed. The Chairman Town Committee, which issued the Certificate of Exclusion from any of the obligations under the previous Contract Agreement, also reached between the Defendant and the Town Committee, under which the Town Committee owed the Defendant to the Town Committee. It was agreed to receive the notice after which a similar notice was issued to the respondent in order to recover the dues due to the agreement issued to the applicant. The Validate Town Committee could not attempt to obtain the applicant and the defendant separately, either he had to retrieve the petitioner or the defendant, but when the respondent took the stand it was the contractor. And the admission was made by the Town Committee that the Committee could not issue any recovery notice to the applicant, but the decision and order of the Appellate Court could not be retained, despite clearly reading the error and the evidence. And was therefore set apart. pakistani advocates Feroz Watan lawyer