Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD JAVED KHAN versus SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR

Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional Substance Vacancy Selecting for a Discrimination Policy Decision, the applicant applied for the position to be advertised following the applicant's application but was not appointed because he did not respond to the respondents. Have gotten less than Applicant's complaint was that there was a mark for years of experience. The candidates were allotted for each full year and as they had 4 years, 6 months and 18 days experience. Therefore, a period of more than 6 months should be counted as one year and instead of giving the number 4, the authorities should give the number 5 according to the policy of the government, which may be less than one year short term eligible. No, the policy was the same for all candidates and the applicant was not discriminated against because the defendants had additional experience for more than 6/7 months but were also neglected by the department. Representation was properly considered but in light of the present decision, the decision that its representation could not be accepted Was treated equally and no discrimination was shown, the marks of other respondents were calculated correctly for the experience and were given 4 marks for which they were entitled and That there was no discrimination in the applicant's case, the High Court refused to interfere in the election trade by endorsement ortimate PITE was removed in Lamine when you need a advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer