Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD PUNHAL versus DR. ABDUL WAHID ABBASI

Pakistan Penal Code Section 420/466/467/468/471 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 200, 202, 203 and 439 Review Trial After recording the statement after the complainant under Section 200, the CCP did not record the reasons for postponing the proceedings and seeking preliminary inquiry as required under section 202, the CCP Trial Court Section 203, CRPC also ignored the essential requirement of law. In dismissing the complaint, the trial court was unlawful in connection with the proceedings in connection with the trial, which was a clear violation of the essential requirements of the law. Show that the accused committed fraud, a document forgery, or used a false document as genuine, and I either demanded or accepted the CCP Section 200, CRPC In his statement, the accused did not say a word by the Medical Board regarding the commission of any such offense, so it is also suggested that the opinion of the accused radiologist is not correct, trial trial. The court can be remanded to harass the accused, who was a senior doctor at the civil hospital complainant, at the trial. In the preliminary inquiry into the matter, he closed his eyes and did not have any witnesses examined. The registration of a case against the accused sought for the direction of any further inquiry or the trial court was not allowed to seek remand for new orders. online advocate from Khair Pur Mir lawyer